Reviews by shoegaze_vulpes86

๐˜™๐˜ถ๐˜ด๐˜ต ๐˜•๐˜ฆ๐˜ท๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ ๐˜š๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฑ feels like two albums seamlessly woven into one. The first half is built around intimate acoustic folk songs, while the second bursts into loud, distorted rock, creating a contrast that gives the album much of its character.

Listening to ๐—›๐—ฒ๐˜† ๐—›๐—ฒ๐˜†, ๐— ๐˜† ๐— ๐˜† (๐—œ๐—ป๐˜๐—ผ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—•๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ธ), itโ€™s easy to hear why Neil Young would later earn the nickname โ€œGodfather of Grunge.โ€ The genre was still years away, but the raw guitars, heavy sound, and uncompromising spirit of the song clearly point towards what many grunge bands would embrace a decade later.

๐˜™๐˜ถ๐˜ด๐˜ต ๐˜•๐˜ฆ๐˜ท๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ ๐˜š๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฑ is a compelling reminder of Neil Youngโ€™s versatility. Few artists could move so naturally between quiet introspection and explosive rock while sounding unmistakably like themselves.

With ๐˜๐˜ฏ ๐˜™๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฐ๐˜ธ๐˜ด, the โ€œgreatest band of all timeโ€ โ€” at least according to some Radiohead fans โ€” also came up with one of the most talked-about release strategies of its era. For a few weeks, listeners could decide for themselves how much they wanted to pay for the download. For a band this big, that was a genuinely bold move.

Musically, ๐˜๐˜ฏ ๐˜™๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฐ๐˜ธ๐˜ด is warmer, more intimate, and more accessible than much of Radioheadโ€™s earlier work. It feels less monumental than ๐˜–๐˜’ ๐˜Š๐˜ฐ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฑ๐˜ถ๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ or ๐˜’๐˜ช๐˜ฅ ๐˜ˆ, but also more relaxed and human. The songs are consistently strong, the production is beautiful, and the album never outstays its welcome.

It is not quite one of my absolute Radiohead favourites, but it comes close enough.

๐˜Œ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ค๐˜ต๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ค ๐˜ž๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ runs on swagger, hooks, and Marc Bolanโ€™s unmistakable charm. The songs are often built from very simple ingredients, but the fuzzy guitars, loose grooves, and playful vocals make the whole album feel instantly distinctive.

It is glamorous without becoming ridiculous and catchy without feeling disposable. Not every song is essential, but the albumโ€™s style and confidence carry it a long way.

๐˜š๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ค๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜ง๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜š๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ญ ๐˜™๐˜ฆ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ด is a solid debut, but I never found it quite as extraordinary as its reputation suggests. Despite the title, I wouldnโ€™t really call it a soul album. To my ears, itโ€™s much closer to post-punk with strong R&B influences than to soul itself.

The album is full of passion, urgency, and energetic performances, and itโ€™s easy to hear why Dexys Midnight Runners quickly developed such a devoted following. Yet, for all its strengths, the songs rarely stayed with me once the album had finished.

More than anything, I felt the album was missing that one defining track โ€” the song that instantly lodges itself in your memory and makes you want to come back. ๐˜š๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ค๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜ง๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜š๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ญ ๐˜™๐˜ฆ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ด is certainly a good record, but for me it remains more admirable than unforgettable.

OK ComputerRadiohead

Rated 10/10

Few albums divide opinion quite like ๐˜–๐˜’ ๐˜Š๐˜ฐ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฑ๐˜ถ๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ. Browse enough reviews and youโ€™ll find every reaction imaginable: โ€œoverratedโ€, โ€œmusic for crybabiesโ€, โ€œI hate Radioheadโ€ โ€” and plenty that are even less polite. Some listeners canโ€™t stand Thom Yorkeโ€™s voice, others never warm to Jonny Greenwoodโ€™s unconventional guitar work. And, contrary to popular belief, not everyone who gives this album a perfect score is a devoted Radiohead fan.

Iโ€™m not interested in settling that debate. All I know is that ๐˜–๐˜’ ๐˜Š๐˜ฐ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฑ๐˜ถ๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ does everything I want an album to do. Its songwriting, atmosphere, and musicianship come together so naturally that I never feel the urge to skip a track or question a creative decision.

Whether Radiohead are overrated or underrated is a debate Iโ€™ll happily leave to everyone else. I only know one thing: once ๐—”๐—ถ๐—ฟ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐—ด begins, Iโ€™m staying until the final note of ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜. Every single time.

VulnicuraBjรถrk

Rated 8/10

๐˜๐˜ถ๐˜ญ๐˜ฏ๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ถ๐˜ณ๐˜ข is yet another reminder of why I admire Bjรถrk as one of the most original artists of her generation. The album is emotionally devastating, while its blend of strings, electronics, and intimate songwriting creates an unmistakably bjรถrky atmosphere that nobody else could quite replicate.

I wouldnโ€™t necessarily recommend ๐˜๐˜ถ๐˜ญ๐˜ฏ๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ถ๐˜ณ๐˜ข as the best entry point into Bjรถrkโ€™s catalogue. Personally, Iโ€™d suggest exploring some of her earlier work first โ€” even if those albums arenโ€™t included in the 1001 Albums list. That said, ๐˜๐˜ถ๐˜ญ๐˜ฏ๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ถ๐˜ณ๐˜ข is a deeply rewarding listen that draws you into Bjรถrkโ€™s singular musical world.

On a lighter note, Iโ€™ve always found Bjรถrkโ€™s beautifully rolled r strangely charming. Itโ€™s especially noticeable on ๐—•๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ธ ๐—Ÿ๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ฒ, where it somehow becomes part of the albumโ€™s emotional intensity.

๐˜๐˜ถ๐˜ญ๐˜ฏ๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ถ๐˜ณ๐˜ข may not be the defining Bjรถrk album for me, but it reminds me why almost nobody sounds quite as bjรถrky as Bjรถrk herself.

๐˜ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ฏ๐˜จ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ ๐˜›๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ ๐˜ ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ฅ๐˜ข๐˜บ finds The Byrds confidently expanding their musical horizons. Folk rock remains at the heart of the album, but itโ€™s enriched by touches of psychedelia, country, jazz, and baroque pop, giving the record a refreshing sense of variety without ever losing its identity.

One of the albumโ€™s greatest strengths is its songwriting. Every track feels carefully crafted, and the different musical influences come together surprisingly naturally. Rather than sounding like a collection of experiments, ๐˜ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ฏ๐˜จ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ ๐˜›๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ ๐˜ ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ฅ๐˜ข๐˜บ remains remarkably cohesive from beginning to end.

The Byrds were never content to stand still, and this album is proof of that. It captures a band growing in confidence, broadening its sound, and producing one of the most rewarding folk-rock records of the 1960s.

๐˜๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ท๐˜บ ๐˜ž๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ finds Weather Report at their creative peak. The musical chemistry between Joe Zawinul, Jaco Pastorius, and Wayne Shorter is extraordinary, with each player complementing the others without ever competing for the spotlight. The result is a jazz fusion album that is as melodic as it is technically accomplished.

My only real complaint is ๐—ฅ๐˜‚๐—บ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ ๐— ๐—ฎ๐—บรก. It breaks the albumโ€™s momentum and, for me, never feels quite as essential as the surrounding tracks. Without it, the record would flow even more naturally.

Otherwise, ๐˜๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ท๐˜บ ๐˜ž๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ is an outstanding example of jazz fusion at its most accessible and rewarding. Few albums capture the joy of musicians listening and responding to one another quite as effortlessly as this one.

If someone had written the script for ๐˜›๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜’รถ๐˜ญ๐˜ฏ ๐˜Š๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ค๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ต, nobody would have believed it. You have an exhausted Keith Jarrett battling severe back pain, a still-young ECM Records founder, Manfred Eicher, who had yet to discover that this would become his labelโ€™s defining success, and an understandably panicked teenage concert promoter, Vera Brandes, desperately trying to find a playable Bรถsendorfer grand piano on a January afternoon in Cologne after the wrong instrument had turned up.

On paper, every ingredient for a complete disaster was there. In reality, it became one of the greatest improvised piano performances ever recorded. Jarrett somehow turned exhaustion, pain, and an imperfect piano into music of extraordinary beauty.

Sometimes the best albums are meticulously planned. Sometimes everything goes spectacularly wrong โ€” and the result is pure magic. ๐˜›๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜’รถ๐˜ญ๐˜ฏ ๐˜Š๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ค๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ต belongs firmly in the second category.

By the time I got to ๐˜’๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ๐˜ด ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ž๐˜ช๐˜ญ๐˜ฅ ๐˜๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ, I felt as though Iโ€™d already heard too many new wave albums. While Adam and the Ants certainly have their own distinctive style, this record never did much to change that feeling.

The Burundi-inspired drumming and tribal rhythms give the album a unique identity, but the songs themselves rarely held my attention. I can appreciate how original the sound must have been in 1980, yet it never really clicked with me.

I understand why ๐˜’๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ๐˜ด ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ž๐˜ช๐˜ญ๐˜ฅ ๐˜๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ became such an influential record, but despite its originality, it simply isnโ€™t an album I see myself returning to.

CutThe Slits

Rated 6/10

๐˜Š๐˜ถ๐˜ต is one of the strangest albums Iโ€™ve heard from the post-punk era. The Slits blend reggae rhythms with post-punk energy in a way that shouldnโ€™t really work โ€” yet somehow it often does.

What I admire most is the bandโ€™s willingness to experiment. The fusion of the two styles gives the album a sound all its own, even if it occasionally feels a little odd. I like the idea behind it more than I enjoy every moment of the execution.

๐˜Š๐˜ถ๐˜ต may never become one of my favourite post-punk albums, but I can easily appreciate why it has earned such an influential reputation. Sometimes being different is its greatest strength.

Chelsea GirlNico

Rated 8/10

For many listeners, Nico is best known for the three songs she sings on ๐˜›๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ท๐˜ฆ๐˜ต ๐˜œ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜จ๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ & ๐˜•๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ฐ. ๐˜Š๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ข ๐˜Ž๐˜ช๐˜ณ๐˜ญ shows that there was far more to her than that. Her unmistakably deep voice and distinctive accent give the album a haunting beauty that sets it apart from the folk-pop records of its time.

The orchestral arrangements make the album surprisingly accessible, even if Nico herself famously disliked the added strings and flutes. Their lush sound contrasts beautifully with her detached, almost statuesque vocal delivery, creating an atmosphere that is both elegant and melancholic.

In hindsight, ๐˜Š๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ข ๐˜Ž๐˜ช๐˜ณ๐˜ญ feels like the closest Nico ever came to becoming a mainstream pop star. Instead, she chose a radically different path, embracing darker and far more experimental music on her later albums. Ironically, it was that uncompromising artistic direction that eventually made her an icon of alternative and art pop, with her influence growing significantly during the 1980s and even more after her death. Looking back, itโ€™s hard not to see Nico as one of the most fascinating figures in the history of pop and rock music.

The ChronicDr. Dre

Rated 6/10

๐˜›๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜Š๐˜ฉ๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ช๐˜ค is impossible to fault from a production standpoint. Dr. Dreโ€™s G-funk sound is smooth, distinctive, and hugely influential, and itโ€™s easy to hear why the album became a hip-hop classic.

Where it loses me is in its lyrical content. The production often keeps me listening, but the themes donโ€™t do much for me and make it difficult to connect with the album as a whole. I was also surprised by how much of the spotlight is taken by Snoop Dogg. He delivers excellent performances, but at times it feels as though ๐˜›๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜Š๐˜ฉ๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ช๐˜ค is as much his showcase as it is Dr. Dreโ€™s.

I completely understand the albumโ€™s reputation and influence. Even so, while I admire its production, it never fully clicks with me as a complete listening experience.

๐˜“๐˜ฆ๐˜ตโ€™๐˜ด ๐˜Ž๐˜ฆ๐˜ต ๐˜’๐˜ช๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ certainly creates a mood, but it never gives me much reason to pay attention. The albumโ€™s blend of beats, samples, and cinematic textures is well crafted, yet I rarely felt engaged by what I was hearing.

Rather than drawing me in, the music simply drifted by. I kept waiting for a track or moment that would make me stop and listen more closely, but it never came. By the end, I was left feeling surprisingly indifferent.

As background music, it works well enough. As an album to actively sit down and listen to, though, it simply isnโ€™t for me.

๐˜Ž๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฐ๐˜ท๐˜ช๐˜ฏโ€™ is an enjoyable blue-eyed soul album, but it suffers from being released in one of the greatest years in popular music. When placed alongside so many groundbreaking records from 1967, it inevitably feels a little too safe and understated.

That doesnโ€™t mean itโ€™s without charm. The (Young) Rascals deliver warm vocal harmonies, effortless grooves, and consistently strong melodies that make the album an easy listen from beginning to end. The performances are polished, and the songwriting is undeniably solid.

Even so, I never felt the album reached the same creative heights as many of its contemporaries. ๐˜Ž๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฐ๐˜ท๐˜ช๐˜ฏโ€™ is a thoroughly enjoyable record, but in such an extraordinary musical year, being merely good isnโ€™t always enough to stand out.

๐˜ž๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฉ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ: ๐˜š๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜จ๐˜ด ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ ๐˜š๐˜ต๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ฆ๐˜ด never really clicked with me. At over seventy minutes, the album feels far longer than it needs to be, and I found it difficult to stay engaged from beginning to end.

My biggest issue is that Bob Mouldโ€™s guitar sound becomes surprisingly repetitive over the course of the album. While the energy rarely lets up, too many songs blur together, making it difficult for individual tracks to stand out.

I can appreciate the ambition behind the album, but for me it would have been far more effective with a shorter running time and a little more variety.

๐˜Ž๐˜ฐ๐˜ญ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ ๐˜๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ณ is a pleasant album, but not quite the country record I was expecting. While there are occasional country touches, the music leans much more heavily towards polished pop, leaving me wishing those roots had played a bigger role.

What kept me listening was Kacey Musgraves herself. Her warm, expressive voice is the albumโ€™s greatest strength, bringing charm and sincerity even to songs that I found fairly average.

As a pop album, ๐˜Ž๐˜ฐ๐˜ญ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ ๐˜๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ณ works well enough. As a country album, though, it left me wanting more. In the end, I enjoyed it, but I never felt it rose much above being a solid, if unremarkable, listen.

๐˜‹๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ฌ๐˜ญ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ๐˜ด proves that The Jesus and Mary Chain didnโ€™t need walls of feedback to create a compelling album. By scaling back the noise, the band allows its melodies, shimmering guitars, and understated songwriting to take centre stage.

What impresses me most is the atmosphere. The album is filled with a quiet melancholy that runs through almost every song, creating a dreamlike mood that never feels forced. Instead of overwhelming the listener, ๐˜‹๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ฌ๐˜ญ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ๐˜ด gradually draws you into its world.

I actually prefer this approach to the bandโ€™s noisier side. The songs have more room to breathe, and the albumโ€™s subtle, reflective character makes it an even more rewarding listen. For me, ๐˜‹๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ฌ๐˜ญ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ๐˜ด is one of the finest examples of how atmosphere can be just as powerful as volume.

ElasticaElastica

Rated 8/10

๐˜Œ๐˜ญ๐˜ข๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ข is usually labelled as a Britpop album, but to my ears that only tells part of the story. Its post-punk influences are impossible to miss, and the albumโ€™s raw, guitar-driven sound sets it apart from many of its Britpop contemporaries.

What I enjoy most is its directness. The songs are short, energetic, and packed with sharp riffs, never wasting a moment. Rather than aiming for grand choruses or polished production, ๐˜Œ๐˜ญ๐˜ข๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ข thrives on attitude, momentum, and simplicity.

Maybe thatโ€™s why I like it so much. It may have arrived during the Britpop era, but it feels just as indebted to post-punk as it does to Britpop. That combination gives the album a distinctive identity and makes it one of the more interesting British rock records of the 1990s.

๐˜ˆ ๐˜‹๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ฆ ๐˜ž๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ฉ ๐˜›๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜Œ๐˜ท๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ญ๐˜บ ๐˜‰๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ด is certainly an unusual album title, but it also provides the perfect way to describe my experience. As a first date, it goes rather well. The Everly Brothersโ€™ trademark close harmonies are beautiful, the melodies are consistently pleasant, and the album is easy to enjoy from beginning to end.

The problem is that Iโ€™m not sure Iโ€™d ask for a second date. While the songs are undeniably charming, they begin to blur together after a while, and by the end very little has stayed with me.

So yes, Iโ€™d happily accept the first date โ€” but Iโ€™m not convinced there needs to be a second.