Rated 2/10
I really hate these hypersexualized lyrics. It doesn't really matter if it's made by a male or a female artist - It just never sat right with me.. I don't need to hear about dripping pussy (or dicks).
The entire genre isn't really for me.
Sounds like a party band.. as in they were drunk and high when they recorded this.
Rated 4/10
No more Dylan covers!
Rated 6/10
Pretty good folk!
Rated 4/10
Pretty boring electronic stuff.
Rated 4/10
Much more "polished" than Superfuzz Bigmuff. Doesn't sound very authentic...
Budget Nirvana
Rated 6/10
Banger parade in the beginning, and the rest is boring in comparison...
Rated 8/10
Great (late) follow up , which sounds almost like Loveless.
Rated 6/10
Crazy good production and the singles are bangers - the rest feels like filler
Rated 6/10
very quiet record
Rated 8/10
Lots of bangers! Pretty much how I define the 70's (rock) sound
Rated 4/10
This feels a lot longer than it was, I guess it's the slow pace of his voice... His voice is cool though.. But I don't really like it mixed with the 80s production.
Rated 4/10
Britpop without the bangers
Rated 6/10
Very listenable. Folk, country, blues elements. Ååååååh Susanne vil du gifte dig med mig?
Rated 6/10
Smooth production, horny vibes, I guess it's a good R&B album
Not what I imagined The Kinks was?
More folksy than rocky.
Lacks bangers, but overall good.
Rated 8/10
Loved it. Great energy.
Rated 6/10
Interesting. Lots of jazz but also vocals and stuff.
Rated 4/10
She still has a great voice and some of the songs were good. Never saw the plot twist coming that Hitler was a good dancer 🤷
Pretty horny. A few bangers. Kinda enjoyed it.
