Reviews by shoegaze_vulpes86

Itโ€™s great to hear a straight-up rock record coming out of Mali, especially one shaped so clearly by displacement and resilience. ๐˜”๐˜ถ๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ค ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ ๐˜Œ๐˜น๐˜ช๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ blends desert blues with tight, modern guitar work in a way that feels both familiar and refreshing. Still, the album doesnโ€™t hit me as hard as I hoped, and within the context of the 1001 list it feels like part of an overcompensating push to represent African music more heavily. A solid listen, but not a standout for me.

๐˜—๐˜ฆ๐˜จ๐˜จ๐˜บ ๐˜š๐˜ถ๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ feels like one of those great hidden gems โ€” wildly ambitious, politically charged, and overflowing with Julian Copeโ€™s eccentric charm. The album moves through psych-rock, ambient textures, and groovy, hypnotic jams with an ease that makes its scope genuinely impressive. The only real drawback is the sheer length; itโ€™s a lot to take in at once, and some stretches feel more like mood pieces than essential songs. But even so, the highs are striking, and the albumโ€™s personality is unmistakable. A sprawling, rewarding trip.

๐˜›๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜“๐˜ฐ๐˜ธ ๐˜Œ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ ๐˜›๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜บ is minimalist, smooth, and deeply rooted in jazz โ€” a blueprint for laid-back, thoughtful hip-hop. The interplay between Q-Tip and Phife Dawg is sharp, and the production has that warm, upright-bass pulse that defines the albumโ€™s whole aesthetic. Still, as much as I admire its influence and clarity, it doesnโ€™t fully grab me on a personal level. Itโ€™s a cool, intelligent record, just not one Iโ€™m eager to revisit often.

๐˜—๐˜ข๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ง๐˜ช๐˜ค ๐˜–๐˜ค๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ ๐˜‰๐˜ญ๐˜ถ๐˜ฆ feels like the great unexpected triumph in the extended Beach Boys universe. Dennis Wilsonโ€™s rough, soulful voice and his surprisingly intimate songwriting give the album a depth that none of the other solo Beach Boys projects quite reach. The arrangements are warm, weathered, and quietly ambitious โ€” full of pianos, horns, and that sense of California melancholy he carried so naturally. Itโ€™s easy to see why this record is often called the best Beach Boys solo effort: it has heart, character, and a lived-in sincerity that lingers long after it ends.

MurmurR.E.M.

Rated 6/10

๐˜”๐˜ถ๐˜ณ๐˜ฎ๐˜ถ๐˜ณ is the quintessential jangly debut โ€” hazy, melodic, and wrapped in Michael Stipeโ€™s famously indistinct vocals. The guitars shimmer in that unmistakable Southern college-rock way, and the songs drift by with a gentle, low-key charm. Itโ€™s an important starting point for R.E.M., but its subtlety also means it doesnโ€™t always leave a strong impression on me. Pleasant, foundational, but not quite gripping.

๐˜—๐˜บ๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฎ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ช๐˜ข is solid, radio-ready British heavy metal, polished by Mutt Lange into something big, bright, and built for arenas. The riffs hit hard enough, the hooks are undeniable, and the production makes everything feel larger than life. Still, it leans so heavily into its glossy sound that it never quite grabs me the way other early-80s metal does. A strong record, but not essential for me.

Folk music certainly existed before The Byrds โ€” Dylan had already reshaped the landscape โ€” but ๐˜”๐˜ณ. ๐˜›๐˜ข๐˜ฎ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ ๐˜”๐˜ข๐˜ฏ marks the moment when folk fused with electrified pop and essentially launched a whole new genre. The bright jangle of the 12-string guitar and the tight vocal harmonies would become foundational for the Laurel Canyon scene and countless bands that followed. And honestly, the title track works far better here than in Dylanโ€™s original form: concise, melodic, and transformed into something shimmering and airborne. The rest of the album may lean heavily on covers, but its impact is undeniable.

๐˜”๐˜บ ๐˜Ž๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ isnโ€™t The Whoโ€™s strongest album, but itโ€™s impossible to ignore the impact of its title track. That song alone crystallized the raw frustration and restless energy of 1960s youth in a way few bands ever matched. The rest of the record is uneven but full of hints of what The Who would later become โ€” loud, defiant, and stylistically bold. As a debut itโ€™s historically important, even if it doesnโ€™t stand as their most consistent work.

๐˜š๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ค๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ˆ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฃ๐˜ช๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต ๐˜ž๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ฌ๐˜ด ๐Ÿช๐Ÿงโ€“๐Ÿซ๐Ÿค has a warmth and clarity that still feels startlingly fresh. The combination of ambient textures and gentle techno rhythms creates an atmosphere thatโ€™s immersive without ever drifting into background music. In many moments, the album could almost pass for a lost Brian Eno project โ€” the same sense of calm, space, and melodic subtlety, just filtered through early-90s bedroom electronics. Itโ€™s a deeply inviting record, and even if some tracks are rough around the edges, that rawness is part of its charm.

๐˜๐˜ญ๐˜ญ ๐˜Š๐˜ฐ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฎ๐˜ถ๐˜ฏ๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ feels like hip-hop made for people who grew up on fuzzed-out guitars and skate videos โ€” a collision of breakbeats, punk energy, jazz flourishes, and Beastie Boys sarcasm. Itโ€™s messy in the best way: loud, loose, and full of personality. The group leans hard into their hybrid identity here, crafting a sound thatโ€™s as comfortable with hardcore riffs as with boom-bap rhythms. Itโ€™s not pure hip-hop in the traditional sense, but thatโ€™s exactly why it works. As a kind of gateway record for rock listeners, itโ€™s surprisingly effective and still a lot of fun.

I still struggle with Dylanโ€™s voice โ€” the nasal bite and jagged phrasing arenโ€™t exactly easy listening for me โ€” but thereโ€™s no denying how strong this album is. ๐˜๐˜ช๐˜จ๐˜ฉ๐˜ธ๐˜ข๐˜บ ๐Ÿจ๐Ÿฃ ๐˜™๐˜ฆ๐˜ท๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ is sharp, electric, and full of momentum, with a band sound that feels surprisingly modern for 1965. The writing is dense and vivid, and even when the delivery grates on me, the songs themselves are compelling enough to pull me through. Itโ€™s a landmark record, and despite my issues with Dylanโ€™s vocals, I canโ€™t help but admire how well it all holds together.

Quincy Jones shaped ๐˜–๐˜ง๐˜ง ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ž๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ญ into a slick, deeply funky record, and you can hear his fingerprints all over the arrangements โ€” bright horns, tight grooves, and a polished sense of rhythm. Still, while the album is an important step in Michael Jacksonโ€™s evolution, it doesnโ€™t feel like his best work to me. The genre range is fairly narrow, especially compared to the stylistic breadth he would reach on ๐˜›๐˜ฉ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ. As a showcase of potential, itโ€™s impressive; as the work of someone destined to become the โ€œKing of Pop,โ€ it doesnโ€™t yet fully get there โ€” even though the raw talent is obvious.

๐˜”๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ธ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ ๐˜—๐˜ฐ๐˜ด๐˜ต ๐˜—๐˜ข๐˜ท๐˜ช๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ feels like a glimpse of what pop music could sound like in an alternate universe โ€” one where the Beatles kept recording into the 2000s and 2010s and fully embraced psychedelic electronics. The album is overflowing with color and movement: layered harmonies, looping patterns, warm synth swells, and rhythms that seem to stretch and fold around themselves. Itโ€™s experimental, but never alienating; joyful, but never shallow. The songs shimmer with this sense of ecstatic possibility, as if the whole record is in constant bloom. For me, itโ€™s one of the rare albums where ambition and accessibility meet perfectly.

๐˜š๐˜ถ๐˜ณ๐˜ท๐˜ช๐˜ท๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ is a polished, energetic slice of early-2000s R&B, full of tight harmonies, glossy production, and hooks that still land surprisingly well. Itโ€™s easy to appreciate how cleanly the album is put together and how confidently the trio delivers each track. Still, even with its strong moments, itโ€™s not the kind of record I feel compelled to revisit โ€” enjoyable in the moment, but not one that really stays with me afterward.

๐˜”๐˜ข๐˜ค๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ ๐˜๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ฅ is classic hard rock delivered with precision, grit, and a surprising sense of momentum. Even without relying on its most overplayed hit, the album stands strong โ€” but I canโ€™t resist mentioning the riff that everyone on earth knows: ๐—ฑ๐˜‚๐˜‚๐—ป-๐—ฑ๐˜‚๐˜‚๐—ป-๐—ฑ๐˜‚๐˜‚๐—ปโ€ฆ ๐—ฑ๐˜‚๐˜‚๐—ป-๐—ฑ๐˜‚๐˜‚๐—ป-๐—ฑ๐˜‚๐˜‚๐˜‚๐˜‚๐—ป. Beyond that iconic moment, the record shows the band at full power: Ritchie Blackmore playing with a cutting clarity and a sense of controlled fire, Jon Lordโ€™s Hammond roaring like a second guitar, and Ian Paice driving everything with effortless intensity. Itโ€™s lean, heavy, and endlessly replayable โ€” a reminder of how tight and inventive Deep Purple could be at their peak.

๐˜›๐˜ฆ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ข๐˜จ๐˜ฆ ๐˜๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ฅ is easy to appreciate historically but harder for me to enjoy. Its raw, Rolling-Stones-styled blend of garage rock and blues just isnโ€™t a sound I connect with, even though the band plays it with real grit and conviction. Still, the album has genuine interest as an overlooked piece of rock history โ€” one of those records that quietly shaped later punk and garage scenes even if it never broke through at the time. Worth hearing once for context, but not something Iโ€™d return to.

This album is often held up as a landmark of Americana, but to my ears it leans more toward polished country pop than raw, rootsy storytelling. The songwriting is solid and Williamsโ€™ voice has character, yet the production smooths things out in a way that blurs some of the emotional grit the songs seem to aim for. Itโ€™s easy to appreciate and well-crafted, but it doesnโ€™t quite deliver the rough-edged authenticity I expect from Americana.

Future DaysCan

Rated 8/10

๐˜๐˜ถ๐˜ต๐˜ถ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ ๐˜‹๐˜ข๐˜บ๐˜ด presents Can at their most serene and immersive, drifting into an ambient, liquid sound world where everything feels carefully blended. Itโ€™s bittersweet knowing this was Damo Suzukiโ€™s final album with the band, because his understated presence fits perfectly into this softer, more atmospheric direction. Jaki Liebezeitโ€™s drumming is the quiet marvel of the record โ€” precise, fluid and hypnotic without ever calling attention to itself. While it doesnโ€™t hit the same heights of wild creativity as ๐˜›๐˜ข๐˜จ๐˜ฐ ๐˜”๐˜ข๐˜จ๐˜ฐ, ๐˜๐˜ถ๐˜ต๐˜ถ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ ๐˜‹๐˜ข๐˜บ๐˜ด is still a beautiful, transportive listen that shows just how elegantly Can could evolve.

๐˜›๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ž๐˜ช๐˜ญ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ต! is lively, brassy and full of personality, but vocal jazz just isnโ€™t the style that grabs me. The albumโ€™s mix of jump-blues energy, big-band flair and comedy routines has its charm, yet the constant showmanship can feel a bit excessive if youโ€™re not fully into this kind of performance. Itโ€™s easy to appreciate the momentum and musicianship, but the record lands more as entertaining background fun than something Iโ€™m deeply drawn to.

I understand why this album matters historically, and Rod Stewart is clearly capable of making strong, characterful music. But ๐˜Œ๐˜ท๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜บ ๐˜—๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ต๐˜ถ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ ๐˜›๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜ด ๐˜ข ๐˜š๐˜ต๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜บ doesnโ€™t strike me as particularly special anymore. The rough production and the mix of folk, rock, blues and soul feel more like a loose scrapbook than a focused album, and the charm that once defined it doesnโ€™t fully carry over for me. There are moments where everything clicks, but as a whole it feels dated rather than timeless, interesting rather than compelling.