Reviews by shoegaze_vulpes86

๐˜๐˜บ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฐ๐˜ค๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜บ ๐˜๐˜ด ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜Ž๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ต ๐˜“๐˜ถ๐˜น๐˜ถ๐˜ณ๐˜บ is more interesting for what it has to say than for how it sounds. Musically, it is not one of the strongest hip-hop records of the early 1990s, although its dense, confrontational production occasionally brings Public Enemy to mind. Michael Franti has a powerful, commanding voice, but over a full album his delivery can become a little too monotonous.

What holds my attention more is the subject matter. The record is deeply political and very much rooted in 1992, yet some of its criticism has aged remarkably well. Its focus on television as a force shaping public opinion may sound tied to its era, but replace television with social media, algorithms, and online platforms, and much of the argument still feels relevant today.

I respect the albumโ€™s intelligence and ambition, but I find its ideas more memorable than the music itself.

ManassasManassas

Rated 6/10

๐˜”๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ข๐˜ด๐˜ด๐˜ข๐˜ด may have Stephen Stills at the centre, but anyone expecting another ๐˜‹รฉ๐˜ซร  ๐˜๐˜ถ should lower their expectations. The album is divided into four separately titled sides, which makes it look more varied on paper than it actually sounds. The shifts between rock, folk, country, and blues are there, but they rarely feel distinct enough to justify the structure.

There is plenty of strong musicianship and an easygoing West Coast atmosphere, but at nearly 75 minutes the album simply overstays its welcome. What starts out as warm and inviting gradually turns into one long, pleasant blur.

By the end, ๐˜”๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ข๐˜ด๐˜ด๐˜ข๐˜ด feels less like four different musical chapters and more like an extended soundtrack to Laurel Canyon life. Nice place to visit, but I would not want to spend quite this long there.

RepeaterFugazi

Rated 8/10

๐˜™๐˜ฆ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ is the kind of punk album that reminds me why the genre can be so exciting. It has all the urgency and aggression of hardcore, but Fugazi never let that energy become one-dimensional. There is rhythm, tension, space, and enough variation to keep the album constantly engaging.

What I like most is how controlled everything feels. The guitars are sharp, the rhythm section is restless, and the songs hit hard without collapsing into pure noise. Every burst of aggression feels deliberate.

This is punk with brains as well as muscle. A genuine post-hardcore classic, and pretty close to how I want punk music to sound.

๐˜—๐˜ถ๐˜ฏ๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜’๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ด is a wonderfully odd choice for a list like 1001 Albums You Must Hear Before You Die. It sits somewhere between classical music, jazz, cabaret, and art pop, never settling comfortably into any one category. That makes it difficult to classify, but also much more interesting than a conventional pop record.

At times, it almost feels like a Divine Comedy album with Ute Lemper taking over the lead vocals. The theatrical arrangements and literate songwriting fit her dramatic voice surprisingly well, giving the whole record a distinctive personality.

And naturally, Kurt Weill has to make an appearance. Lemper has built much of her reputation interpreting music from the interwar period, so ๐—ง๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ด๐—ผ ๐—•๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ฑ from The Threepenny Opera feels less like an obligatory inclusion and more like a natural part of the album.

I enjoyed ๐˜—๐˜ถ๐˜ฏ๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜’๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ด enough to give it 4/5, but I still would not have chosen it for an essential-albums canon. Then again, its sheer oddness may be exactly why it is worth hearing.

๐˜›๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜“๐˜ฆ๐˜น๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜“๐˜ฐ๐˜ท๐˜ฆ has everything you might expect from polished early-80s synth-pop: glossy production, sharp melodies, dramatic arrangements, and no shortage of style. I can easily understand why so many people regard it as one of the eraโ€™s standout records.

For me, though, the elegance never quite turns into excitement. The album is consistently well made, but it feels a little too polished and self-conscious to really pull me in.

A good record, certainly, and an important one for its style โ€” but not one of the great new wave albums for me.

Calling ๐˜๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ถ๐˜น ๐˜›๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด an EP feels almost misleading. At around half an hour, it has the structure and flow of a proper album rather than something that feels slight or transitional.

The music sits firmly in modern R&B, but with enough neo-soul warmth to keep it from sounding too slick. Sullivanโ€™s voice carries the record, while the spoken interludes add personality and help connect the songs.

Short, cohesive, and very well put together. Whatever the label says, this feels like a full album to me.

It somehow feels fitting that Buck Owens was never closely associated with the Grand Ole Opry. His music belongs much more to Bakersfield than Nashville: sharper guitars, a leaner sound, and less of the polish usually associated with countryโ€™s establishment.

Unfortunately, that distinction does not make the album especially memorable for me. After hearing quite a few country records from this era, ๐˜โ€™๐˜ท๐˜ฆ ๐˜Ž๐˜ฐ๐˜ต ๐˜ข ๐˜›๐˜ช๐˜จ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ ๐˜ฃ๐˜บ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜›๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ญ often feels like familiar territory. It is well played, catchy, and perfectly enjoyable, but very little really stands out once the album is over.

A solid example of the Bakersfield sound, just not one that leaves much of a lasting impression on me.

๐˜”๐˜ถ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฅ๐˜บ ๐˜ž๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ด ๐˜ข๐˜ต ๐˜•๐˜ฆ๐˜ธ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ต ๐Ÿฃ๐Ÿซ๐Ÿจ๐Ÿข feels like a blueprint for the live blues album. The band is tight, the performances are full of swagger, and Muddy Waters sounds completely in command from the first song onward. Nothing here feels polished for the sake of it; the energy of the performance does most of the work.

What makes the album stand out is how immediate it still sounds. You can hear the band pushing each other, the audience reacting, and the songs opening up in ways that a studio recording rarely allows. It captures the blues as something physical and communal rather than merely historical.

For an early live album, it holds up remarkably well. If I had to point to one recording as a reference for how electric blues should work on stage, this would be high on the list.

๐˜๐˜ฎ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ข๐˜ญ ๐˜‰๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฎ has moments that remind me of a Paul McCartney solo record: carefully shaped melodies, ornate arrangements, and the occasional orchestral flourish. The craftsmanship is obvious, but that does not automatically make the album engaging.

For me, everything feels a little too polished and self-conscious. The songs are clever and the arrangements are ambitious, yet very little actually sticks with me. Instead of being drawn into all the detail, I mostly find myself admiring it from a distance.

There is clearly a lot of work and imagination in ๐˜๐˜ฎ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ข๐˜ญ ๐˜‰๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฎ, but surprisingly little of it makes me want to hear the album again.

There really isnโ€™t much left to say about ๐˜š๐˜จ๐˜ต. ๐˜—๐˜ฆ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณโ€™๐˜ด ๐˜“๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜บ ๐˜๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ต๐˜ด ๐˜Š๐˜ญ๐˜ถ๐˜ฃ ๐˜‰๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ. Its reputation, influence, and ambition have been discussed endlessly, and for once the praise feels completely justified.

For me, ๐—” ๐——๐—ฎ๐˜† ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—ณ๐—ฒ is the final argument. It may well be the greatest Beatles song ever committed to an album, and it closes an already extraordinary record in exactly the right way.

Sometimes a classic is simply a classic.

๐˜Š๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ง๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ฏ๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ is an album I like more for what Flea and John Frusciante are doing than for the songs themselves. Their playing gives the record most of its personality, especially when the band slows down and lets the bass and guitar create some atmosphere.

Anthony Kiedis is the part that wears me down. On several of the singles, his nasal delivery, phrasing, and vocal melodies start to feel almost interchangeable, which makes the album more repetitive than it should be. Some of the later tracks break away from that formula and are more interesting because of it.

Even then, ๐˜Š๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ง๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ฏ๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ feels oddly ordinary for an alternative-rock album from 1999. There were plenty of records around that time taking bigger risks or developing more distinctive sounds. Flea and Frusciante keep this one afloat, but not enough to make me want to return to it.

๐˜›๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ด ๐˜•๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏโ€™๐˜ด ๐˜š๐˜ข๐˜ท๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜Ž๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ค๐˜ฆ is repetitive, abrasive, and oddly addictive. The songs often seem to run on stubborn riffs and Mark E. Smithโ€™s half-spoken sneer, yet the album has far more hooks than its rough surface initially suggests.

It is still unmistakably difficult music, but the tension between chaos and catchiness makes it surprisingly enjoyable. Probably the best possible introduction to The Fall.

๐˜›๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜—๐˜ช๐˜ฑ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ ๐˜ข๐˜ต ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜Ž๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ด ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜‹๐˜ข๐˜ธ๐˜ฏ is at its best when Pink Floyd leave conventional song structures behind and disappear completely into space. ๐—”๐˜€๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ผ๐—บ๐˜† ๐——๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ถ๐—ปรฉ and ๐—œ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฒ๐—น๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ฟ ๐—ข๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ are the obvious highlights, combining psychedelic atmosphere, strange sounds, and a genuine sense of exploration. These are the moments when the album still feels exciting rather than merely historically interesting.

The more whimsical songs are less convincing to me. Syd Barrettโ€™s childlike imagery and playful storytelling certainly give the record its unique personality, but his lyrics can also feel rather naive. What is charming in small doses gradually becomes a little tiresome over the course of the album.

There is no shortage of imagination here, and it is fascinating to hear how different this version of Pink Floyd sounds from the band they would later become. Still, I prefer the cosmic experimentation to the nursery-rhyme eccentricity, leaving me with an album I respect more consistently than I enjoy.

Being ThereWilco

Rated 8/10

๐˜‰๐˜ฆ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜›๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ is an Americana classic: restless, melodic, and packed with excellent songs. Wilco move naturally between country rock, folk, and noisier detours, giving the album both warmth and unpredictability.

Unfortunately, it is also a classic double album in the less flattering sense: there is simply too much of it. A tighter version might have been exceptional, but even in its overlong form, the best moments are hard to resist.

How can a voice this nasal remain compelling rather than irritating? How could such a young songwriter already possess so much wit, insight, and confidence? And how can an album built almost entirely around one man, a guitar, and a harmonica already be a masterpiece?

The answer, my friend, is blowinโ€™ in the wind.

๐˜›๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜‰๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ค๐˜ฉ ๐˜‰๐˜ฐ๐˜บ๐˜ด ๐˜›๐˜ฐ๐˜ฅ๐˜ข๐˜บ! is clearly moving towards ๐˜—๐˜ฆ๐˜ต ๐˜š๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ๐˜ด, but it is not there yet. As with the Beatles, I find the earlier albums more interesting as steps in the bandโ€™s development than as records I genuinely want to revisit.

There are some lovely melodies here, and Brian Wilsonโ€™s growing ambition is easy to hear. Unfortunately, his falsetto also wears me down after a while. I know it is one of the Beach Boysโ€™ defining sounds, but that does not mean I have to enjoy it for an entire album.

A decent transitional record, but the best was still to come.

Its position at the top of Rate Your Musicโ€™s all-time chart suggests that many consider ๐˜›๐˜ฐ ๐˜—๐˜ช๐˜ฎ๐˜ฑ ๐˜ข ๐˜‰๐˜ถ๐˜ต๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ง๐˜ญ๐˜บ one of the greatest albums ever made. I would not go quite that far, but its ambition is undeniable.

The dense mixture of hip-hop, jazz, funk, and spoken word constantly offers something new to discover, and the unusually large cast of guest musicians and vocalists adds even more colour without making the album feel like a compilation. More importantly, it gives me insight into experiences and cultural realities far removed from my own without ever feeling like a history lesson.

I may not connect with every moment equally, but this is challenging, imaginative hip-hop that rewards close attention.

ImagineJohn Lennon

Rated 6/10

๐˜๐˜ฎ๐˜ข๐˜จ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ features one of Phil Spectorโ€™s more restrained and tasteful productions. The sound is warm and spacious without being smothered by his usual excess, particularly on ๐—œ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ and ๐—๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜€ ๐—š๐˜‚๐˜†. To my ears, both songs even anticipate some of the soft, hazy qualities we would now associate with dream pop.

The title track could easily have belonged on a late Beatles album โ€” under the customary Lennonโ€“McCartney credit, naturally. Unfortunately, the rest of the record never feels quite as timeless. ๐—›๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐——๐—ผ ๐—ฌ๐—ผ๐˜‚ ๐—ฆ๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ฝ? is the clearest low point: a musically effective song weighed down by an attack on Paul McCartney that feels bitter and unnecessary.

There is enough beauty here to understand the albumโ€™s reputation, but not enough consistency for me to share its highest praise.

๐˜‰๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ ๐˜”๐˜ข๐˜ค๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ is deliberately harsh, primitive, and percussion-heavy, but I am not always convinced that this approach brings out the best in Tom Waitsโ€™ carefully cultivated persona. His growling voice and cast of broken characters should feel at home in such a grim setting, yet some of the more abrasive tracks strike me as theatrical in a rather forced way.

The quieter ballads work much better. They give Waits the space to be strange, vulnerable, and compelling without burying him beneath all the clatter. An interesting album, certainly, but one I admire more often than I enjoy.

xxThe xx

Rated 8/10

๐˜น๐˜น is less dreamy than many similar albums from the era, but that works in its favour. The music is sparse, intimate, and built around quiet tension rather than lush atmosphere.

The restrained vocals and minimal arrangements take a little time to unfold, but the album remains consistently engaging. It never pushes too hard, yet it has a distinctive mood that kept me listening.