Reviews by callimar

Wow, another album of the kind I had hoped for on this journey! I didn't know many of Billy Joel's older songs and have to admit that every one of the nine songs on “The Stranger” is really great. I especially like the rockier and jazzier moments—or both together, as in “Movin' Out.” Very nice, a must-listen!

I wasn't really familiar with Steely Dan, and it was nice listening to their album “Countdown To Ecstasy” because it's an exciting mix of pop rock, hard rock, jazz, and blues. I like the jazzy sounds and arrangements on “Bodhisattva” and “My Old School,” but also the very clear and catchy vocals on “Razor Boy” and the rougher-sounding “The Boston Rag.”
This is exactly the kind of music I was expecting when I signed up for the daily album challenge. It won't be my favorite album going forward, but it's a very nice discovery.

I read in the liner notes that Captain Beefheart (aka Don Van Vliet) had difficulty finding a label to release “Safe As Milk” because it was too unconventional. That surprises me, because to me it sounds like a normal blues rock album with great guitar sound (Ry Cooder!) and poorly produced vocals. The experimental elements I expected are few and far between and, for my taste, not well placed. You could probably describe the Captain's singing style as “experimental,” but in my opinion, that would just be a nice way of saying that he doesn't measure up to the Magic Band and their songs. As for the latter, the relatively well-known “Yellow Brick Road” stands out slightly for me.

I don't exactly hate new wave, my issue is that it is mostly just more of the same. Some artists managed to innovate or at least give the songs their own vibe. In contrast, all the "Songs From The Big Chair" could be played by any other 80s synth pop band and you wouldn't even realize that it is a cover version. Even the voice is always the same - or did all those bands share the same singer? Is this the definition of "Was OK at it's time but did not age very well"?

I read that The War On Drugs was an indie rock band with various influences. However, what I hear on “Lost In The Dream” is technically well-crafted mainstream pop rock, which, in my opinion, is heavily influenced by Dire Straits. However, it lacks Mark Knopfler's unique characteristics and—since the album was released in 2014 rather than the 1970s—any innovative power. It's very good to listen to in the background, but of course there are a hundred other similarly good options out there.

For some reason, I was never that much into Queen. This, I only knew "Stone Cold Crazy" and "Killer Queen" from "Sheer Heart Attack". After listening to that album twice now I must admit that all tracks are worth a listen and most of them are really cool. Apart from the mentioned well known songs I like "Now I'm Here", "In the Lap of the Gods" as well as the triad of "Tenement Funster"; "Flick of the Wirst" and "Lily of the Valley" that together already give an idea of "Bohemian Rhapsody" that would be published one year later. Nice one!

I listened to Jane's Addiction's “Ritual de lo Habitual” three times in its entirety today, but I still have trouble really understanding it. On the surface, this is a really good album that exudes both the atmosphere of late '80s stadium rock and early '90s alternative rock. I have always liked that distinct Hollywood sound in general and Dave Navarro's guitar playing in particular and "Ritual de lo Habitual" doesn't disappoint in this regard. However, according to available records, a considerable amount of heroin was involved in the production, and I suspect that probably none of those involved can say with certainty which parts of the album are intentionally incredibly complex and which parts simply reflect chaos. Sometimes there's a fine line between insanity and genius, and Jane's Addiction crosses it several times in both directions on “Ritual de lo Habitual.” The result is a frightening but also difficult-to-access masterpiece. Exciting!

I knew that “The Doors” was a great album, but I hadn't listened to it in a while. And what can I say? It's even better than I remembered! Literally every one of the eleven songs is a timeless classic! What I find amazing is that every aspect of it is strong: of course, the songwriting is top-notch, but the two covers, “Alabama Song” and “Back Door Man,” also fit seamlessly into the whole. Of course, Jim Morrison's characterful voice carries every song, but so do Ray Manzarek's keyboard playing and John Denmore's drumming. Robby Krieger holds back in the interest of the songs—compared to later rock guitarists—but when he does get a solo spot, he delivers spectacularly. When you consider that the members of The Doors had only experience in completely different musical styles before this album, it's the ultimate proof of a crazy amount of talent! I'm usually hesitant to say this, but it's downright magical.

Yes, this album actually contains 69 songs, and I couldn't find two that were exactly the same. Congratulations—mission accomplished!
On closer inspection, this project has all the weaknesses you'd expect: many of the songs are difficult to distinguish from one another, some are very short (do they even count?), and none of them have been comprehensively arranged and produced. In other words, the whole thing prioritizes quantity over quality, and I don't like that.
The Magnetic Fields brought “69 Love Songs” to the stage, but refused to play it in its entirety in one evening. Apparently, they were annoyed by their own material.

I wasn't thrilled when another album from the 80s was recommended to me. I didn't know The Triffids and expected new wave music, but when I found out that it was actually a folk rock band, I became curious. It turned out that "Calenture" contains some really good songs, at least if you like a lot of reverb on the vocals and snare (the 80s...). In addition to the very professional arrangements, this album contains 12 tracks in the original release, each of which has its own mood. Therefore, it is difficult to pick out individual tracks. The changing drum pattern in “Kelly's Blues,” the main groove in “Hometown Farewell Kiss,” the bells in “Holy Water,” the well-placed breaks in "Blinder by the Hour" or the raw sound in “Vagabond Holes” were highlights for me.

The Bee Gees were great singers and songwriters. Unfortunately, only hints of this can be heard on “Trafalgar.” The album starts with the actually good ballads “How Can You Mend a Broken Heart” and “Israel”, but by “The Greatest Man In The World” at the latest, it's really just more of the same and becomes increasingly irrelevant. I'm not entirely sure why this album sould be a must-listen. Perhaps to properly understand the Bee Gees' later development?

Isaac Hayes has a great voice, the songs on "Hot Buttered Soul" are nicely arranged, I like the experimental approach with only four lengthy songs... But still, it somehow didn't really catch me. Solid easy listening stuff.

"A Grand Doesn't Come For Free" by The Streets is a rap opera. If you now expect a comprehensive story line or at least songs that build upon each other you will be badly disappointed. Basically, all the songs are about a guy that's mostly either drunk or stoned and thus is not sure whether the girl he's dating is into his buddy. Oh, and his savings fell behind the TV, damaging it. That's about it. Mike Skinner calls this shallow story a concept and even manages to sell an album around this. Another admirable achievement from a commercial point of view.

For me, Leonard Cohen was always more of a poet who occasionally set one of his works to music. Apart from the magnificent “Hallelujah,” this usually involved him reciting his poem while more or less appropriate music played in the background. Against this backdrop, it seems only logical that he tried his hand at synth-based background music in the 1980s. However, I would consider this experiment on “I'm Your Man” to be a failure. On the one hand, the rather lively music, especially on “First We Take Manhattan” or “Jazz Police,” does not fit Cohen's calm delivery or even his voice at all. And on the other hand, when he does try to really sing—as on “I Can't Forget,” for example—he quickly reaches his limits. For me, “I'm Your Man” is not a coherent work overall—not really a disappointment, but rather a testament to the things Leonard Cohen wasn't very good at.

“This is Fats Domino” was recorded in 1957, and I must admit that for me, it only makes sense to evaluate it from a historical perspective. I largely agree with Fats Domino that the “rock ‘n’ roll” he delivers here is actually New Orleans rhythm and blues. However, the songs “Honey Chile” and “What's the Reason I'm Not Pleasing You” definitely have rock ‘n’ roll vibes.
In addition to Domino's legendary version of “Blueberry Hill,” I also recommend “Blue Monday” and “Mardi Grass in New Orleans.”

“The Köln Concert” is a live recording of improvisational pianist Keith Jarrett. While it was certainly exciting to listen to without knowing what to expect that evening, I would classify the recording as somewhere between easy listening and deep focus. Jarrett's broad stylistic repertoire means that the music shifts between different styles and is therefore mostly unpredictable. On the other hand, he manages to weave influences from romanticism to jazz into a harmonious whole without any real breaks.
I find it challenging to rate because there are only a few comparable albums on the list—most likely other concert recordings such as “Live at the Regal” by B.B. King. In this context, my conclusion would be something like “nice, but not groundbreaking.”

This is going to be an easy review. A guy who spouts random nonsense, accompanied by a short-circuited keyboard—you could say that Dizzee Rascal's “Boy in da Corner” has everything I don't need. It's the classic “songs for people who don't like music” stuff you find on any random rap record. I admit that the beats are above average. And of course, it's respectable that Rascal was the first UK hip-hop artist to achieve major international success. Still, I don't like this album.

Primal Scream's "Vanishing Point" is a nice, mediocre psychedelic rock album. What confuses me is that it was only recorded in 1997—to my ears, it could be much older. That already points to my biggest criticism: I expect at least a certain degree of innovation from the albums on this list, but this album is so generic and predictable—if not downright boring. My summary says that I like psychedelic rock (and I do), but for me, Vanishing Point is average at best. So, yes, it's a solid album...

Kind of Blue is the ultimate jazz album and, in addition to its great concept, features one of the best combo lineups imaginable (Coltrane, Adderley, Evans/Kelly, Chambers, Cobb). Personally, I really like the modal approach, as you can add or reduce any timbres at any time, thus achieving an infinite number of expressive possibilities. On this album, Miles Davis and his band demonstrate what can be achieved with this approach, while at the same time opening up the field for all styles of jazz that are no longer strictly based on chord changes. And each of the five pieces on “Kind of Blue” is a legend in its own right.

Wikipedia states that the Incredible Bongo Band's "output consisted of upbeat, funky, instrumental music". What it does not mention is that this music is randomly interrupted by ridiculously monotonous and repetitive bongo, conga, whatever drum parts. That's a real shame, because the overly simple and undynamic drum sections detract from the professional impression made by the songs, which are actually good and carefully arranged. Sure, it was a contemporary experiment in the early 1970s, but from today's perspective, it was a failed one. What a pity!