Rated 6/10
Different. I liked it.
Rated 6/10
Different. I liked it.
Rated 4/10
The hits were okay. The rest were awful.
Rated 6/10
Standard 80s fare
Rated 6/10
Quirky and fun.
Pretty good, but Clapton has never really appealed to me, not sure why.
Rated 4/10
Sounds like the worst of REM combined with the theme song from the TV show “Friends”.
Rated 6/10
Pleasant. Not too exciting.
Soulful 70s funk or maybe funky 70s soul. Either way, “yes please”.
Rated 6/10
Liked it more than I expected, but sounded kind of “same same” by the end. I doubt I will listen to it again.
Rated 6/10
I kinda liked it. Would be 4/5 but it was a bit uneven and had some weird homophobic lyrics.
Rated 4/10
If you want grunge, choose Pixies, Sonic Youth, Nirvana. Why listen to Pearl Jam?
Rated 10/10
Amazing.
Rated 6/10
Nothing wrong with it, it’s just not my style.
Rated 2/10
The second album by a British singer nobody has ever heard of. Why has nobody heard of him?
Because he sucks.
This album is not enjoyable, even in an ironic way. Not at all.
Lyrics: self-indulgent, clunky, offensive.
Vocal style: ranges between ho-hum and awful.
Musical arrangements: boring.
Rated 8/10
The stoners in the back of the school bus played this all the time.
Rated 6/10
Nothing special.
Rated 10/10
Even the lesser known songs are fantastic.
Rated 4/10
I want my 52 minutes back. Only appeal seems to be for people who lived in Britain and were teenagers in the 90s.
Rated 4/10
Disappointing, and I usually like Nick Cave.
Rated 6/10
Not sure why she is so popular.