Reviews by shoegaze_vulpes86

Hot FussThe Killers

Rated 4/10

๐˜๐˜ฐ๐˜ต ๐˜๐˜ถ๐˜ด๐˜ด delivers the breakout single ๐— ๐—ฟ. ๐—•๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต๐˜๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ, a track that deserves its status thanks to its driving momentum and instantly memorable hook. But beyond that highlight, the album leans heavily on familiar post-punk revival tropes โ€” glossy synths, echoing guitars, and dramatic vocal delivery โ€” without pushing the formula into particularly new territory. The songs are polished and catchy enough, yet they feel more like variations on sounds already established by earlier indie and new wave acts rather than something distinct or groundbreaking. The result is a record that has one undeniable anthem but struggles to stand out as a whole.

๐˜‘๐˜ถ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฌ๐˜บ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ฅ relies on chaos, noise and confrontation as its main tools, but instead of feeling thrilling or purposeful, the album often comes across as messy and grating. The songs lean so heavily on abrasion โ€” frantic guitars, shouted vocals and jagged rhythms โ€” that they leave little room for atmosphere or structure to take hold. The rawness may be intentional, yet it rarely translates into something emotionally or musically rewarding. For a listener not drawn to this kind of aggressive deconstruction, the most notable aspect of the record ends up being that Nick Cave is the frontman, rather than anything the album itself achieves.

๐˜“๐˜ข ๐˜™๐˜ฆ๐˜ท๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ค๐˜ฉ๐˜ข ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ ๐˜›๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜จ๐˜ฐ introduces electrotango as a distinctive fusion, blending traditional bandoneรณn lines and tango atmosphere with electronic beats and downtempo production. The concept is refreshing and immediately recognizable, giving the album a strong identity right from the first tracks.

While the mixture of old and new creates a stylish mood, the record leans heavily on that formula. The arrangements are smooth and polished, but the songs sometimes feel more like variations on a single idea than a journey with dramatic shifts. The album works excellently as a vibe โ€” cinematic, smoky, and rhythmically elegant โ€” yet doesnโ€™t always evolve enough to stay gripping across its full runtime.

A fascinating and unusual sound, even if the novelty becomes the main appeal rather than a fully immersive album experience.

WarU2

Rated 8/10

๐˜ž๐˜ข๐˜ณ captures U2 at a moment of urgency and conviction. The album replaces the dreamlike sound of their early work with sharp guitars, martial drums and an unmistakable sense of confrontation. Rather than using politics as imagery, the songs express how real-world conflict shapes ordinary lives.

๐—ฆ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐˜† ๐—•๐—น๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ฑ๐˜† ๐—ฆ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐˜† directly reflects on the 1972 Bloody Sunday massacre in Derry, voicing shock and exhaustion at the cycle of violence rather than taking a side. ๐—ก๐—ฒ๐˜„ ๐—ฌ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฟโ€™๐˜€ ๐——๐—ฎ๐˜† looks outward toward Europe, inspired by the Solidarnoล›ฤ‡ movement in Poland and the hope that collective resistance could lead to change.

What makes the album striking is that the intensity doesnโ€™t come from anger alone, but from a feeling of moral pressure โ€” as if the band had no choice but to turn turmoil into sound. Itโ€™s forceful, emotional and focused, while still grounded in melody.

SuicideSuicide

Rated 2/10

๐˜š๐˜ถ๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ may be historically important, but that doesnโ€™t make it a satisfying listen. The album relies almost entirely on repetition and looping synth patterns, and instead of building tension in a dynamic way, many tracks stay locked into a single idea without real development. What was meant to feel hypnotic can instead feel monotonous and draining.

The emotional outburst on ๐—™๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ธ๐—ถ๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ฝ amplifies that effect โ€” the screaming and escalating breakdown donโ€™t feel cathartic if youโ€™re not already in sync with the albumโ€™s approach. Rather than unsettling in a deliberate artistic way, it can simply come across as abrasive and unpleasant.

Even recognizing its influence on later noise and experimental music doesnโ€™t make the experience more enjoyable. Compared with Sonic Youthโ€™s early albums, which use dissonance and harsh textures to create atmosphere and tension, ๐˜š๐˜ถ๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ feels one-dimensional and stuck, focused on provocation more than musical progression.

๐˜›๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜š๐˜ถ๐˜ฃ๐˜ถ๐˜ณ๐˜ฃ๐˜ด is a well-crafted album with a clear sense of scale and ambition, but its emotional spark appears only in select moments. The band from Quebec builds a polished sound palette โ€” lush arrangements, strong dynamics and a theme that runs consistently through the record โ€” yet not every track carries the same intensity. Compared to ๐˜๐˜ถ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ญ, the sense of wonder and urgency feels scattered rather than constant.

When the album clicks, it does so beautifully: certain songs capture that sweeping, cathartic Arcade Fire magic, where melody and momentum spill over with feeling. But in between those highlights, the pacing softens and the atmosphere becomes more restrained than gripping, resulting in an uneven listening experience.

Good music overall, just not consistently transformative.

๐˜ ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฌ ๐˜Š๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ feels like a record built with absolute intention. Every riff, break and repetition is tightened to the point of tension โ€” not chaotic, not sloppy, but intense by design. The long tracks donโ€™t meander; they push forward with a nervous energy that keeps building instead of resolving, turning pressure into momentum.

The album doesnโ€™t rely on hooks or emotional cues to communicate. Its impact comes from structure and friction โ€” guitars grinding against rhythms, patterns locking and unlocking, everything slightly on edge. Once you tune into that logic, it becomes absorbing and surprisingly powerful.

Itโ€™s the kind of record that would have lived perfectly on Bandcamp if it had existed at the time: niche, uncompromising, and made for listeners who want something built on artistic conviction rather than accessibility.

๐˜Œ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ž๐˜ถ-๐˜›๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜จ (๐Ÿฅ๐Ÿจ ๐˜Š๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ฎ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ด) is raw, chaotic and full of personality. The production has a gritty, unpolished feel that gives the album a tough underground atmosphere, and the groupโ€™s rotating lineup keeps the verses constantly shifting in tone and energy. Thereโ€™s an unpredictable spark to the record โ€” you never quite know what voice or mood will come in next.

At the same time, that same looseness can make the album feel uneven. The rough edges are part of the aesthetic, but they can also make it harder to stay consistently immersed. Some tracks hit hard immediately, while others blur together without leaving as strong an impression.

Thereโ€™s clearly a lot of creativity here, but not every moment lands with the same impact.

๐˜™๐˜ฆ๐˜ฎ๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ฏ ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ ๐˜“๐˜ช๐˜จ๐˜ฉ๐˜ต thrives on its dense, interlocking polyrhythms. The album layers guitars, bass, keyboards and percussion in repeating patterns that continuously shift, overlap and evolve, creating a hypnotic sense of motion. Instead of traditional verseโ€“chorus structures, the music builds gradually, adding new rhythmic and textural elements until each track becomes almost trance-like.

What makes it compelling is how the grooves feel both mechanical and organic โ€” tight enough to sound engineered, yet fluid enough to feel alive. The influence of West African rhythmic concepts is clear, but theyโ€™re reinterpreted through a distinctly art-rock perspective, resulting in music thatโ€™s experimental without losing its sense of momentum and drive.

Itโ€™s an album that stays engaging because the further you listen into a track, the more there is happening. The complexity never overwhelms; it pulls the listener deeper. A rare case where intellectual and physical energy work perfectly together.

๐˜Ž๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฆ๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ๐˜ด ๐˜ง๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฎ ๐˜“.๐˜ˆ. has a solid musical foundation โ€” the grooves are strong, the arrangements are confident and the instrumentals carry a certain smoky, late-night energy. However, the experience is heavily shaped by Tim Buckleyโ€™s vocal delivery, which can feel strange and distracting rather than expressive. His style dominates to the point where it overshadows the otherwise well-crafted tracks, making it difficult to settle into the music.

Even though the album has good elements, the unconventional singing prevents them from fully connecting, resulting in an uneven listen rather than a rewarding one.

๐˜๐˜ฐ๐˜ต ๐˜‰๐˜ถ๐˜ต๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ ๐˜š๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ญ stands out through its luxurious instrumental arrangements and the unmistakable presence of Isaac Hayesโ€™ voice. The extended orchestral passages and smooth grooves give the album a cinematic feel, and instead of rushing through songs, it lets them unfold slowly and confidently. Hayesโ€™ vocals tie everything together โ€” warm, commanding and full of personality โ€” turning long tracks into immersive experiences rather than indulgences.

It isnโ€™t flawless, but when the rich instrumentation and powerful voice lock in, the album reaches a unique emotional depth that few soul records attempt at this scale. Stylish, expressive and memorable.

๐˜—๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ค๐˜ฆ ๐˜š๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜ดโ€ฆ ๐˜ฃ๐˜ถ๐˜ต ๐˜ž๐˜ฉ๐˜ฐโ€™๐˜ด ๐˜‰๐˜ถ๐˜บ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ? delivers a very pure form of 80s thrash metal: fast riffs, aggressive vocals, restless drumming and constant technical intensity. Itโ€™s clearly well-executed, but it also feels very typical of the genre. For listeners who arenโ€™t deeply into metal, the songs can blend together, and the albumโ€™s trademarks may feel more conventional than exciting.

There are standout moments โ€” especially the title track โ€” but they donโ€™t necessarily open the music up beyond its stylistic boundaries. The social and political themes add character, yet they donโ€™t fully change the experience if the core sound isnโ€™t already appealing.

A strong example of classic thrash, but not much more than that unless youโ€™re already a fan of the style.

A landmark that deserves to be heard by anyone, even people who mostly listen to rock or pop. ๐˜๐˜ต ๐˜›๐˜ข๐˜ฌ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด ๐˜ข ๐˜•๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜”๐˜ช๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ด ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜๐˜ฐ๐˜ญ๐˜ฅ ๐˜œ๐˜ด ๐˜‰๐˜ข๐˜ค๐˜ฌ isnโ€™t just a classic hip-hop record โ€” itโ€™s one of the defining albums of modern music, period. The dense production, the political urgency, and the sheer force of Chuck Dโ€™s delivery make it impossible to ignore. You donโ€™t have to be a hip-hop fan to feel the impact: without ๐˜•๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜”๐˜ช๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ด, itโ€™s hard to understand why the genre exploded in the 1990s and became a global cultural force. Not an easy listen, not a comforting one โ€” but absolutely essential.

๐˜š๐˜ฐ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜Œ๐˜ญ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ captures The Kinks at their most melodic and thoughtful, steeped in the unmistakable sound of 1967 โ€” baroque pop arrangements, wistful nostalgia, and that distinctly English charm Ray Davies made his trademark. Tracks like ๐˜ž๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ญ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฐ ๐˜š๐˜ถ๐˜ฏ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ต are timeless, while the rest of the album drifts between music-hall whimsy and gently psychedelic pop in a way that feels both effortless and deeply of its era. Not every moment hits with the same grace, but when it does, itโ€™s gorgeous โ€” a warm, intimate snapshot of a band quietly operating outside the big Beatlesโ€“Stones axis and carving out their own uniquely British lane.

The CarsThe Cars

Rated 6/10

The Carsโ€™ self-titled debut is one of those albums that always seems to appear on โ€œessentialโ€ lists, and while I can understand why, I canโ€™t quite share the same level of excitement. The band blend pop, new wave and rock with a sleek, radio-ready polish, and the results are undeniably catchy โ€” ๐˜‘๐˜ถ๐˜ด๐˜ต ๐˜ž๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ต ๐˜ ๐˜•๐˜ฆ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ, ๐˜”๐˜บ ๐˜‰๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ต ๐˜๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅโ€™๐˜ด ๐˜Ž๐˜ช๐˜ณ๐˜ญ, and ๐˜Ž๐˜ฐ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฅ ๐˜›๐˜ช๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด ๐˜™๐˜ฐ๐˜ญ๐˜ญ are deserved classics.

But beyond those hooks, the album doesnโ€™t fully captivate me; itโ€™s well-constructed, clever and cool, yet emotionally distant and a little too glossy to truly hit hard. I like it โ€” I just donโ€™t love it. A solid, enjoyable listen that feels more like a perfectly engineered product than a record Iโ€™ll return to often.

๐˜›๐˜ธ๐˜ฐ ๐˜‹๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ค๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ด is a sleek, shimmering piece of art-pop that feels both sensual and feral, built around tightly interlocked guitars, soft percussion and a kind of nocturnal elegance. The element that will make or break this album for most listeners is Hayden Thorpeโ€™s dramatic countertenor โ€” airy, theatrical, and constantly on the edge of falsetto. For some people that voice is an instant deal-breaker; for me it isnโ€™t, and it actually adds personality and strangeness to music that might otherwise feel too polished.

That said, the record doesnโ€™t always land with the weight it seems to promise. The atmosphere is consistent to a fault, and several tracks blur together rather than stand apart. Itโ€™s a beautiful listen, but often more mood than revelation.

A distinctive and memorable album, just not an essential one โ€” interesting, stylish, and occasionally excellent, but not a masterpiece.

๐˜ˆ๐˜ค๐˜ต๐˜ถ๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜บ is sleek, polished synth-pop with plenty of hooks and a cool emotional distance that only the Pet Shop Boys can pull off. When it lands, it really lands โ€” ๐˜๐˜ตโ€™๐˜ด ๐˜ข ๐˜š๐˜ช๐˜ฏ and ๐˜™๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต are undeniable highlights. And the duet with Dusty Springfield on ๐˜ž๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ต ๐˜๐˜ข๐˜ท๐˜ฆ ๐˜ ๐˜‹๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ ๐˜‹๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ท๐˜ฆ ๐˜›๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ด? is easily the albumโ€™s peak: her warmth cutting beautifully through Neil Tennantโ€™s detached delivery.

Still, the album doesnโ€™t sustain that level throughout. Some tracks feel more like exercises in mood than fully engaging songs, and the precision of the production can work against it over a full runtime. A solid, clever record โ€” just not quite the masterpiece its best singles suggest.

The band shows obvious potential on their debut, but it doesnโ€™t quite click for me. The main weak point is Paul Diโ€™Annoโ€™s vocals, which feel limited and rough in a way that drags several songs down rather than giving them character. Still, there are bright spots โ€” ๐˜—๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ๐˜ฎ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜–๐˜ฑ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ข is by far the standout, the first moment where Iron Maidenโ€™s melodic twin-guitar interplay and dramatic songwriting truly break through.

Overall, you can hear the blueprint of what the band would later become, but for now itโ€™s more promise than payoff.

Franz Ferdinandโ€™s debut still hits with a sharp, nervy energy that made early-2000s guitar rock feel exciting again. The bandโ€™s knack for tight, angular riffs and dance-floor rhythms is undeniable, and Alex Kapranos delivers each line with a sly theatrical flair โ€” nowhere more perfectly than the iconic โ€œIch heiรŸe Super Fantastisch!โ€ on ๐˜‹๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ต๐˜ด ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜—๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ด๐˜ถ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ. The full tracklist stays remarkably catchy, stylish, and immediate, and while the formula eventually became overused by others, here it still sounds fresh, confident, and effortlessly cool.

๐˜ˆ๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ ๐˜“๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด sounds gloriously cheap โ€” and thatโ€™s exactly its charm. Recorded for the price of a pizza, itโ€™s a lo-fi masterpiece that embraces tape hiss, rough edges, and sudden song fragments as part of its identity. Guided by Voices feel like the ultimate DIY band, the kind youโ€™d imagine uploading to Bandcamp and curating their own RYM profile if the internet had existed in 1995. Beneath the noise, though, are sharp hooks and genuine songwriting brilliance โ€” proof that great ideas donโ€™t need great budgets.