Reviews by vldndr1

Bummed indeed. This is just some nothing with instruments and vocals.

Ok, I get that it's The Beatles, but why would you include this and not the first record? I think that one is much more deserving. This one is just ok.

Definitely not as good as IV, but still a fun listen. It's got a few bangers, and it sounds pretty rocking.

Generic rock, with the vocals being a bit annoying. I didn't really care much for it.

Ah, the album that enraged most Metallica fans. If only they knew that St. Anger would come 12 years later.
Whatever anyone says, this record is the one that made metal appeal to the masses and made Metallica be one of the greatest bands in history. Yes, you can say they sold out, but that doesn't mean that the album is bad. It's packed with hits! Some of the best songs ever are on this record. And I am saying that while being a fan of the early days of Metallica. This is an undeniable masterpiece and it definitely deserves to be on this list.

This is just basic britpop, but I liked it more than others from this list for some reason. It was an okay listen, nothing that special but okay.

Very chill music with great instrumentation and vocals. This is a great listen both as background music and music to relax after a long day. I enjoyed it pretty much, but it's not a 5 star record though.

I absolutely agree with the inclusion of Elvis on this list (Presley, not Costello, I will never agree with the unjustified amount of Elvis Costello on this list) but I don't think that the albums chosen are the best ones from him. There are better Elvis records in my opinion. Nevertheless, this is a pretty good album, and it has Suspicious Minds on and I love that song, but I will give it a 3 because I am not that blown away and I really think there are better albums to choose from.

Very groovy and fun listen. I enjoyed it from start to finish. The vocals were great, the arrangements were great, but it's not a 5 star record. It's really close though.
Also, track 2. That's it.

In a way, it sounds older than it is, but not that bad. The lyrics though, they are just soooo stupid and hilarious somehow. That's what we were saying and laughing in 5th grade.

It has kind of a medieval sound to it. I like the vocals, but the songs are too hippie for me. Very 60s.

It's a very raw and noisy post punk record, but it's quite accessible somehow. I liked it even though it had a piercing sound.

Although they are not my favourite band out of the first prog rock era, this album is a classic. It has some great songs and complex writing. I enjoyed it. The best part of it is...

...to be continued

One of the most generic shits I have heard ever. It starts with the hit, and it should end there as well. And I never liked that song either. This band is an Oasis clone, but a very bad one.

A scottish person impersonating a jamaican person. As the scottish would say, this is rank!

It was ok, closer to the trip hop genre, which I love, but this is not as good as some of the things from that time. The vocals are not good and the instrumentals are just ok-ish.

It's pretty bad. It sounds like an attempt to copy RATM while failing miserably.

I like the instrumentals more than the delivery. It was ok.

I don't know what is more bland and boring, the band name, the album name or the band itself. I just don't get so many of the picks on this list.

This one has banger after banger! I loved every second of it. Old school hip hop at its best. Nothing was as good as this one during those times, and mainly because it had some amazing singing by Lauryn Hill. Also, the beats are just smashing. Great great record.