Reviews by love2listen

Is it ambient? Is it EDM? I don't care. It's boring.

Easy listening, but interesting enough to go back for more. Vocals reminiscent of Cocteau Twins.

This album is pure fun.

A very comforting album. Maybe it's the acoustic guitar and harmonica, but I see myself sitting by a fire pit in the desert with a glass of red wine in hand, listening to this album.

Aside from a couple of songs, I don't find it memorable.

What a great discovery! During the first few songs, I couldn't tell what decade I was listening to. He incorporates great sounds and techniques from multiple eras and creates a timeless album. Funk, jazz and gospel inspired, with beautiful vocals and dreamy soundscapes.

It grew on me with a second listen. No rest for the wicked.

I generally enjoy Steely Dan's jazzy vibes and vocal harmonies, but I'm not a fan of this one.

Meh. Nothing special. The singer's voice grew more and more annoying the longer the album went on. 3/10

Alice in Chains definitely has its own sound, but once you've heard one song, you've heard nearly all of them. Would? and Rooster are the only two interesting songs, and Would? is the only one I'd listen to again voluntarily. 4/10

Not my favorite Springsteen album, but it's a classic for a reason. It's worth the price of admission just for I'm on Fire and Dancing in the Dark, not to mention Cover Me. 9/10

I like the jazzy tracks, interesting sounds, acoustic instruments on some songs, and the guys' sense of humor. But I wouldn't go out of my way to listen to it again. Good stuff, but not my taste. 6/10

7/10. Stevie Nicks's songs are luminous, but otherwise, I'm not hearing much that's interesting. It's hard to go wrong with Fleetwood Mac, but why this album instead of the self-titled album?

Surprisingly, a solid 8 for me. I'd listen again.

Rating 6. Solid album, but nothing memorable after the title song.