It's something bothering me about this album but I don't know what. Maybe the fact that it has nothing interesting and his voice is annoying. I've seen many albums by this dude included on this list and I just don't get it.
Reviews by vldndr1
Rated 6/10
This is so mid compared to other stuff released by R.E.M.
I didn't enjoy it that much. It wasn't bad but mostly boring.
Rated 10/10
Even though I don't understand a single goddamn word Eddie Vedder sings, this album is essential to the grunge era, which is one of my favourite musical times. Amazing record, it absolutely deserves to be here! Important for grunge, important for music in general, and all around a perfect album.
Rated 2/10
I hate Kings Of Leon. Why is this the second album I get from them? I wanna meet the guy that decided it was great to put them on the list TWICE. THERE IS NOTHING GOOD ABOUT THEM. I just don't get it...
Rated 6/10
I think there wasn't much electronic music in the 70s, so people must have thought that, to sound futuristic, you should have star wars sounds. Nevertheless, if you think that this record is from 1976, it is actually revolutionary. It bored me, unlike some of his later work, but I have to appreciate the creativity involved for those times.
Rated 2/10
Kinda annoying. It made me cringe a bit. There is old electronic music that aged well. This ain't it. And even for that period it's not good.
Rated 8/10
The Police and Sting's songs are my guilty pleasure. I don't know why but something is always very interesting about those. Also, as a guitarist myself, the guitar work in this band was always extremely fun and intricate. I almost broke a joint (or at least that's how it felt) while trying to play Message In A Bottle. Anyway, great record!
Rated 6/10
I enjoyed it pretty much, it's a good New Wave record. Interesting musical choices.
Rated 4/10
I never understood why The White Stripes were so hyped up. The sloppiness of the record is somehow cool, but the songs sound like they belong in the 60s-70s. The production is as bad as back then as well.
Rated 6/10
Yep, it's Bjork. There is something so distinct about her that I immediately said that she is the singer. Actually it's pretty good, not as good as her solo work but great
The panning messed me up. I am not judging it because it's from 1967 and they didn't know yet very much about mixing. The album itself is ok, it is pretty much like The Rolling Stones.
Rated 6/10
For a punk album, it's pretty damn good. The female vocals and the saxofone make it different from other ones.
Rated 4/10
And exactly why does this band belong on this list? I want to meet the editors. I feel like after album 100 they just compiled a list of random records. This is not bad but it's most definitely not good.
Rated 4/10
He did the same thing as he did with The Smiths. So nothing that special.
Rated 6/10
Fun and enjoyable soul. I had a good time listening to it.
Rated 6/10
This was pretty fun actually! I liked it very much. It was different than anything released in the 2000s, and it sounded pretty new for those times.
Rated 2/10
Second country album in a row. I don't like country.
Rated 4/10
I don't like country. It's all the same. This sounds ok but it still is country.
Rated 6/10
This album feels like the end of glam rock and the start of grunge. Nothing that exciting, but a great record. Where is my mind is a banger still.
Rated 4/10
Not a single sweat broken when thinking of that band name huh? Anyway, the songs were pretty generic. This is just a band like any other from the 60s. "A" Band, not "THE" Band.