Rated 8/10
Not the best of its kind, but a clear gap on the original list. Great pick
Rated 8/10
Not the best of its kind, but a clear gap on the original list. Great pick
I enjoyed it, it was a nice discovery, but it could be much shorter, since it becomes tiring very quickly.
Rated 1/10
I didn't get it, neither the album nor why it deserves to be here.
It's hard to say if this will be culturally relevant in 3 or 30 years, but I can state that to me in 2025 it's is indeed relevant and it deserves a place on this type of list. However, it's not something I like to listen to myself, and it was not a joyful listening session. Despite some very popular songs that were in the (good) NPR Tiny Desk version, it's a bland album at best.
Rated 6/10
Meh...good add to the list, but far from great.
Rated 8/10
Reading the Wiki: Another 70s psych rock? Realy? At least it's a German one and not another copy of the USA scene that floods the original 1001 list.
First song: Did you call it a production? Red flag.
After some time: I think these guys know what they are doing. I can enjoy more 30 minutes of it.
Before the improvisations at the end: Wow! I should check their other albums.
In summary, they should throw out the improvisations, but the album is quite good and does not look like a cheap copy of classical psychedelic rock or progressive stuff. It deserves a spot on the list, and I thank the user who picked this one.
Rated 6/10
Some days ago I watched a YouTube video about this album. The video was pretty cool. The album is ok.
Rated 8/10
I need to give it some credit
Rated 6/10
Good for my mood today, but I guess I'll not stay with it for too many time.
Another day, and I was fooled again by the cover art. Good piece of music, but I'll not remember it for more than 2 days (the loop structure of the album successfully made me listen to it 1 time and a half)
Rated 8/10
This is my kind of folk!
Rated 3/10
Given the cover art and the Wikipedia page, I expected something different. My frustration keeps me from really enjoying it, even though I had some small foot moves on some songs.
Rated 3/10
Not my thing, although I can recognize its importance and why some people enjoy it. Here, my rate is much more my fault than any other technical aspect or more elaborate argument.
Rated 6/10
This is truly far from what I enjoy listening to, but it is a good work and it deserves an extra star for being somehow different from the "standard" of the 1001 list (on language, but also on style).
Rated 3/10
Despite 2 or 3 good songs that caught my attention, it's, in general, a quite boring album to me.
Rated 8/10
Hard to evaluate, but I liked it
Rated 3/10
Not specifically to this album, but when I started this 1001 challenge, one of the reasons was to know new stuff with human curation, since I was tired of repeatedly listening to the same thing, and automatic recommendations always tried to fit my own musical taste. The list had problems, but I believe I achieved my goal.
After 80 albums on the users' list, I realize that most people probably had the same reason, since around 80% of the users' submissions sound so generic and uninspired.
This one is also meh...as expected.
Rated 6/10
Nothing new to see here. Young English rockers doing English rock in the early 2000s (the rockest moment to play rock). They did a good job.
Rated 10/10
Any punk album with less than 30 minutes deserves 5 stars, even if nothing is great!
Rated 1/10
Sorry, but no