Reviews by jorrell89

LowDavid Bowie

Rated 10/10

What an album! Two halves that are so different, but somehow work together perfectly.

En-TactThe Shamen

Rated 2/10

So much effort to listen to this album. Which made it even more annoying that it’s just a bit rubbish.

I can’t believe this is the best example of this kind of music. Every song felt the same and very uninteresting. Apple Music auto played the four tops straight after which I immediately liked more.

Maybe it would better if I heard the songs individually.

OdelayBeck

Rated 6/10

Not as good as I remember it being. Still a few great songs on here though

In RainbowsRadiohead

Rated 10/10

Such a great album, coming up to a scary 20 year anniversary (because it feels like it was five years ago).

I think everyone assumed that it couldn’t be the best Radiohead album because ok computer and kid an already existed. But the more you listen to it the closer it gets for me.

A contender for my favourite album of all time.

The wiki describes this as heavy thunderous blues that would later be described as heavy metal. And I would like to suggest we all start calling metal “thunder blues”.

In terms of the music itself. It was kinda interesting to listen to but can’t say I particularly enjoyed it.

Hmm, a weird one to review. This isn’t anywhere near as good as I remember it being. It starts to come together in the second half but the whole thing seems a bit full of itself.

Adding in the weird vibe from the accusations surrounding Win Butler and I can’t imagine I’ll come back to this again.

Luckily I’ve discovered violator by Depeche Mode which is just better than this album anyway. So I don’t need to feel conflicted.

Lots of meh on this album. The one track everyone knows is inexplicably long. I had it on in the background and I was so confused when the main riff kicked back in I thought something had gone wrong.

ViolatorDepeche Mode

Rated 10/10

Makes sense that this came out in 1990. It feels like the perfect version of the 80’s synth music.