Reviews by shoegaze_vulpes86

Peter Gabrielโ€™s third self-titled album โ€” often referred to as ๐˜”๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ต โ€” already shows his growing fascination with non-Western music, particularly African rhythms. The percussion-heavy arrangements and unusual grooves give the record a darker, more experimental character than typical rock albums of the period.

The album also features several notable collaborators, and the musicianship throughout is consistently strong. Even so, the record feels more interesting in concept than in execution. Itโ€™s clearly an important step in Gabrielโ€™s artistic development, but one that doesnโ€™t fully resonate with me.

๐˜š๐˜ต๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฆ๐˜ต ๐˜š๐˜ช๐˜จ๐˜ฏ๐˜ด mixes funk, hip hop, and rock with a strong dose of Latin influences. The band clearly plays with energy and skill, but the overall style doesnโ€™t really work for me. The Latin-fusion approach dominates the sound to such an extent that it becomes difficult for me to connect with the album.

Since only a couple of tracks were available to me, I canโ€™t fully judge the entire record, but even from those songs it was clear that this musical direction simply isnโ€™t my taste.

The debut from Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers is solid, straightforward rock โ€” nothing particularly flashy, but competently done. The band leans heavily on jangly guitars and tight, classic songwriting, capturing that late-70s blend of rock, power pop, and a touch of new wave energy.

There are a few memorable moments that hint at the bandโ€™s future strengths, but overall the album feels more like a promising starting point than a fully realized statement.

๐˜›๐˜ฆ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ ๐˜‹๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ฎ is one of those albums that makes dream pop feel effortless. The songs drift along on warm organ tones, hazy guitars, and the deep, unmistakable voice of Victoria Legrand. Everything moves at an unhurried pace, creating a sound that feels both intimate and expansive at the same time.

What makes the album work so well is its consistency. Tracks like ๐—ญ๐—ฒ๐—ฏ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ, ๐—ก๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜„๐—ฎ๐˜†, and ๐—ฆ๐—ถ๐—น๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ฆ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—น all share the same dreamy atmosphere without ever becoming dull. Instead, the record feels like one long, glowing mood. Itโ€™s simple music in many ways, but the melodies and textures make it surprisingly immersive.

๐˜“๐˜ฆ๐˜ต ๐˜๐˜ต ๐˜‰๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ is a slightly uneven listen for me. At its best, the album reaches extraordinary heights: ๐—š๐—ถ๐—บ๐—บ๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—น๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ, the title track, and ๐—ฌ๐—ผ๐˜‚ ๐—–๐—ฎ๐—ปโ€™๐˜ ๐—”๐—น๐˜„๐—ฎ๐˜†๐˜€ ๐—š๐—ฒ๐˜ ๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ฌ๐—ผ๐˜‚ ๐—ช๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜ are all outstanding songs and among the most memorable moments in the Stonesโ€™ catalogue.

Outside those highlights, however, much of the record settles into fairly straightforward blues rock. Itโ€™s played with confidence and swagger, but it rarely feels as striking as the albumโ€™s strongest material. The peaks are undeniable, yet the rest can feel more workmanlike than inspired.

๐˜”๐˜ฐ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ด๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ฑ ๐˜Š๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ๐˜ค๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ is pure funk spectacle. Led by George Clinton, Parliament turns deep grooves and thick basslines into something larger than life, wrapping their music in a playful sci-fi mythology that became central to the whole P-Funk universe. The rhythms are irresistible, the arrangements loose but confident, and the album never loses its sense of fun.

At its core, though, the appeal is simple: itโ€™s just incredibly funky. Few records capture the joy and swagger of 70s funk this effortlessly.

The IdiotIggy Pop

Rated 6/10

Parts of ๐˜›๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ต sound strikingly like a David Bowie record โ€” which is hardly surprising. At the time, Iggy Pop was living in Berlin with David Bowie, who also produced the album. The music carries that same cold, mechanical atmosphere that would soon define Bowieโ€™s own Berlin period: sparse arrangements, uneasy rhythms, and a detached, almost industrial mood.

Itโ€™s an interesting record, but it sometimes feels more like a Bowie-adjacent experiment than a fully distinctive Iggy Pop statement. Still, its stark sound and strange tension make it a notable chapter in Iggyโ€™s career.

The album with the banana on the cover has a reputation for being difficult โ€” even unlistenable to some listeners โ€” but Iโ€™ve never really felt that way. Its rough edges, stark arrangements, and unsettling themes are exactly what make it so fascinating. Instead of polishing rock music, the band strips it down and pushes it into darker, stranger territory.

In hindsight, itโ€™s easy to hear how influential this record became. The raw directness of ๐—œโ€™๐—บ ๐—ช๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐— ๐—ฎ๐—ป, the hypnotic intensity of ๐—›๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ถ๐—ป, and the eerie atmosphere of ๐—ฉ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜‚๐˜€ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—™๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜€ would later echo through punk and experimental rock alike. What might have sounded alien in 1967 now feels like the blueprint for an entirely different kind of rock music.

๐˜™๐˜ถ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ ๐˜š๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ญ marks the point where the Fab Four from the Mersey begin to move decisively beyond straightforward pop. The melodies are still immediate and tuneful, but the songwriting grows more introspective and subtly experimental. The shift is especially clear on ๐—ก๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜„๐—ฒ๐—ด๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—ช๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ฑ, where George Harrison introduces the sitar โ€” still used almost like a guitar, yet already hinting at the bandโ€™s coming psychedelic turn.

The familiar love songs of their early years donโ€™t disappear here; instead, they become more abstract and emotionally layered. ๐—š๐—ถ๐—ฟ๐—น, ๐— ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—น๐—น๐—ฒ, and above all ๐—œ๐—ป ๐— ๐˜† ๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—ณ๐—ฒ show a band rapidly expanding its expressive range. The latter stands as the albumโ€™s quiet masterpiece โ€” concise, reflective, and deeply affecting.

๐˜™๐˜ถ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ ๐˜š๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ญ still carries traces of their pop origins, but this is where the Beatles truly begin to sound like a band in artistic transition.

๐˜ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ด๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ฎ๐˜ช ๐˜‰๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ต๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜—๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ฌ ๐˜™๐˜ฐ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฐ๐˜ต๐˜ด is one of those albums that feels both whimsical and quietly profound. The Flaming Lips wrap big emotions in bright, synthetic textures, letting childlike imagination coexist with melancholy and anxiety. The concept may be loose โ€” robots, battles, a hero named Yoshimi โ€” but the emotional throughline is surprisingly strong.

The melodies are warm, the production is lush without being overbearing, and Wayne Coyne sings with that fragile, earnest tone that makes even the strangest imagery feel sincere. Itโ€™s a record that manages to be playful and reflective at the same time, and that balance is what makes it endure.

๐˜‘๐˜ถ๐˜ซ๐˜ถ is a sharp, atmospheric blend of post-punk tension and early gothic drama. The guitars slash and shimmer, the rhythm section drives everything forward with icy precision, and Siouxsie Sioux delivers her vocals with that unmistakable mix of control and menace.

Itโ€™s a strong record, but not one that fully grabs me; the mood is consistent, almost to a fault. Still, as a bridge between post-punk and what would soon be called goth rock, itโ€™s an important and intriguing listen.

DrunkThundercat

Rated 8/10

๐˜‹๐˜ณ๐˜ถ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฌ is one of the more intriguing soul-related records of the 2010s โ€” a dizzy blend of funk, jazz, R&B, and Thundercatโ€™s unmistakable sense of humor. The album drifts like a late-night conversation: loose, vulnerable, sometimes absurd, but held together by his effortless bass playing and ear for strange, beautiful harmonies.

What makes it work is the balance between playfulness and melancholy. Even at its most chaotic, thereโ€™s a real emotional core running through these short, fleeting tracks. Itโ€™s an odd album, but a compelling one.

I find myself somewhat divided on this album. Ella Fitzgerald sings with her usual clarity and effortless control โ€” she is such a technically assured vocalist that she could probably make almost any material sound convincing. At times, however, itโ€™s the orchestral work of Nelson Riddle and his orchestra that leaves the deeper impression. Instrumental passages like ๐—”๐—บ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐—ฆ๐˜‚๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฒ and ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฃ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—น๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐˜€ reveal just how rich and carefully crafted the arrangements are.

The scale of the project is both impressive and a little overwhelming. With so many songs gathered together, the album can feel more like a grand showcase of the Gershwin catalogue than a cohesive listening experience. Dividing it into two separate volumes might have made it easier to digest.

Ultimately, my mixed reaction probably comes down to personal taste as well: vocal jazz has never been my preferred corner of the genre. Still, as a large, meticulously arranged tribute to the music of the Gershwins, the album remains an undeniably ambitious undertaking.

GooSonic Youth

Rated 10/10

Iโ€™ll admit it: Iโ€™m biased. I love Sonic Youth, and ๐˜Ž๐˜ฐ๐˜ฐ is one of those albums that makes that bias feel entirely justified. It captures the moment when the band stepped onto a bigger stage โ€” a major label, MTV visibility, mainstream attention โ€” yet somehow became even more themselves in the process.

๐—ง๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ฐ (๐—ฆ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ž๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ป) is the emotional anchor here, a haunting meditation on Karen Carpenterโ€™s life delivered through Kim Gordonโ€™s stark, empathetic voice. It might be the saddest, most quietly devastating song they ever recorded. ๐—ž๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—น ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด, on the other hand, is pure attitude: a sly feminist critique, sharpened by Chuck Dโ€™s perfectly timed interjections. Even today it feels bold rather than gimmicky โ€” a rock song talking ๐˜„๐—ถ๐˜๐—ต hip-hop, not trying to imitate it.

But the deeper cuts are what make ๐˜Ž๐˜ฐ๐˜ฐ feel like a complete world. ๐——๐—ถ๐—ฟ๐˜๐˜† ๐—•๐—ผ๐—ผ๐˜๐˜€ opens the album with drifting chime and sudden lift-off, ending in a joyous haze of distortion. ๐— ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜†-๐—–๐—ต๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜ yanks the tempo upward with manic, jangling energy. Lee Ranaldoโ€™s ๐— ๐—ผ๐˜๐—ฒ is one of his finest contributions โ€” a warm, melancholic song that dissolves into a long, drifting noise passage, the kind of structured chaos that only Sonic Youth can pull off.

๐——๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ floats in suspended melancholy, as if the guitars are hesitating between collapse and lift-off. And ๐—–๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—น๐—ฎโ€™๐˜€ ๐—•๐—ถ๐—ด ๐—ฆ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ quietly holds the mid-album together โ€” a tense, coiled melody constantly straining against the gravitational pull of the bandโ€™s detuned guitars. Itโ€™s not flashy, but itโ€™s essential, a reminder of how much of Sonic Youthโ€™s power lives in those subtle, shifting foundations.

What I love most is the balance: ๐˜Ž๐˜ฐ๐˜ฐ is more accessible than their 80s work, but the edges remain sharp. The guitars still bend unpredictably, the rhythms still lurch and glide, and the melodies still feel like theyโ€™re being discovered rather than performed. Itโ€™s the sound of a band evolving without compromise.

For me, ๐˜Ž๐˜ฐ๐˜ฐ is one of Sonic Youthโ€™s defining moments โ€” confident, strange, emotional, and endlessly replayable.

Disraeli GearsCream

Rated 6/10

๐˜‹๐˜ช๐˜ด๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ช ๐˜Ž๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ด feels like blues-rock with the intensity dialed back โ€” you can sense the bandโ€™s raw power, but it rarely breaks loose. The one true standout is ๐—ฆ๐˜‚๐—ป๐˜€๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—ฌ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐—Ÿ๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ, driven by Eric Claptonโ€™s unmistakable riff, a hook so strong it practically carries the albumโ€™s legacy on its own. Beyond that, the record is competent and occasionally interesting, but it never quite catches fire.

๐˜›๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜“๐˜ข๐˜ฎ๐˜ฃ ๐˜“๐˜ช๐˜ฆ๐˜ด ๐˜‹๐˜ฐ๐˜ธ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜‰๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ข๐˜ฅ๐˜ธ๐˜ข๐˜บ marks the end of the Gabriel era, and itโ€™s exactly as ambitious and theatrical as that turning point suggests. The album is a sprawling, surreal journey, driven by Peter Gabrielโ€™s vivid storytelling and the bandโ€™s tightly interlocked musicianship. When it clicks, itโ€™s imaginative, strange, and completely absorbing.

But the albumโ€™s biggest flaw is its scope. At this length, some passages feel more like conceptual obligation than musical inspiration, and a leaner version would almost certainly land with more force. Still, even with the excess, ๐˜›๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜“๐˜ข๐˜ฎ๐˜ฃ remains a bold and memorable farewell to one of prog rockโ€™s most distinctive lineups.

TidalFiona Apple

Rated 8/10

๐˜›๐˜ช๐˜ฅ๐˜ข๐˜ญ, Fiona Appleโ€™s debut with its understated, almost enigmatic one-word title, is a surprisingly assured introduction. What stands out immediately is how complete her artistic voice already feels: the smoky, flexible vocals, the brooding piano work, and a lyrical sharpness that cuts far deeper than one would expect from a nineteen-year-old.

The album moves with a kind of simmering intensity โ€” intimate one moment, volatile the next โ€” yet always grounded in her distinct sense of melody and phrasing. Itโ€™s not a flawless record, but itโ€™s a fascinating and confident beginning, one that makes it easy to understand why Fiona Apple became such a singular presence in alternative singer-songwriting.

๐˜—๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ๐˜ณ๐˜ข is easily the most natural entry point into Tangerine Dreamโ€™s labyrinthine discography. Despite being more than half a century old, the album sounds almost outside of time โ€” the analog sequences breathe, drift, and evolve in a way that still feels modern, even inevitable.

What impresses me most is how ๐˜—๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ๐˜ณ๐˜ข holds tension between structure and atmosphere: itโ€™s experimental without feeling remote, immersive without becoming aimless. The music unfolds slowly but with purpose, as if discovering itself in real time.

If thereโ€™s one album that shows why Tangerine Dream became a cornerstone of electronic and ambient music, itโ€™s this one.

AutobahnKraftwerk

Rated 8/10

The title track is, unsurprisingly, the centerpiece โ€” a bright, hypnotic electronic voyage that still feels inventive and strangely uplifting. The rest of the album canโ€™t quite match that momentum, though ๐—ž๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ผ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฒ ๐Ÿฎ offers a genuinely lovely melody that softens the drop-off.

Even with its uneven pacing, ๐˜ˆ๐˜ถ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ๐˜ฃ๐˜ข๐˜ฉ๐˜ฏ is a compelling early landmark for Kraftwerk, showing the moment when their experimental impulses began to crystallize into something unmistakably their own.

AbraxasSantana

Rated 6/10

๐˜ˆ๐˜ฃ๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜น๐˜ข๐˜ด makes it easy to hear why Carlos Santana is sometimes framed as a kind of โ€œMexican Hendrixโ€ โ€” his guitar tone is warm, fluid, and instantly expressive โ€” though he never quite reaches the same explosive unpredictability. The album has its strengths, but for me it never fully comes together as a great record. ๐—ฆ๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ ๐—ฃ๐—ฎ ๐—ง๐—ถ stands out as the clear highlight, a beautifully melodic piece thatโ€™s probably his most universally recognized work. The rest is solid, but not essential.